🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “ham sandwich”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have been entangled in a struggle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned controversy over their future often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to put them down unless the authorities pays for the expense of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are deeply intelligent creatures – something one caretaker observed personally.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the nuances and quirks in their personalities. She developed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both transformed the way I view bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say reflects the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The park did not operate to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly results of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier asserted: “The whales … get far higher quality medical attention and 24/7 care than any human in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the facility believed particulars of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was released soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any efforts to put down even a one beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for calls for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a proposal to export the whales to China.

“Allowing the request would have meant a continued life in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments reveal a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As officials work to find a resolution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a important part of sustenance for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Proponents remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a viable solution in the near future.

Charles Vinick, leader of the sanctuary project, said the site will simulate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|